输变电设备不完备数据处理方法的研究

Summary of methods for incomplete data of power transmission and transformation equipment

  • 摘要: 随着智能电网的发展,输变电设备在运行过程中会产生大量监测数据,但受数据采集、传输及存储等环节的 影响,实际数据普遍存在不同程度的数据缺失问题,严重影响后续数据分析与设备状态评估的准确性。针对输变电 设备运行数据的不完备问题,分析了不完备数据的产生原因及缺失机制,并研究了具有代表性的三类数据填补方法, 包括基于邻域信息的K-最近邻(KNN)填补方法、基于统计模型的预测均值匹配(PMM)填补方法及基于特征降 维的主成分分析(PCA)填补方法。基于UCI机器学习库中的WINE、SPECTF和GLASS三个数据集构建不同缺 失率的数据样本,并利用均方根误差对填补效果进行评价,对比分析三种方法在不同缺失率条件下的填补性能。实 验结果表明,在多数情况下,PCA填补方法具有更低的均方根误差和更高的填补准确率,整体性能优于PMM填补 方法和KNN填补方法,在处理具有较强变量相关性的输变电设备数据时具有较好的适用性。同时针对PCA填补方 法仍存在精度提升空间的问题,提出结合邻域信息与机器学习方法进行改进的研究方向,为智能电网环境下输变电 设备不完备数据处理提供参考。

     

    Abstract: With the development of smart grids, a large amount of monitoring data is generated during the operation of power transmission and transformation equipment. However, due to data acquisition, transmission and storage problems, missing data often occur in practical datasets, which affects the accuracy of subsequent data analysis and equipment condition evaluation. To address this issue, this paper analyzes the characteristics and causes of incomplete data and investigates three representative imputation methods, including the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) method, predictive mean matching (PMM), and principal component analysis (PCA). Experiments are conducted on WINE, SPECTF and GLASS datasets from the UCI repository under different missing rates, and the performance of the three methods is evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE).The results show that the PCA-based imputation method achieves lower RMSE and higher accuracy in most cases compared with PMM and KNN methods, is suitable for high-dimensional power equipment data with strong variable correlations. Furthermore, potential improvements combining neighborhood information and machine learning methods are discussed.

     

/

返回文章
返回